<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PureCountryMusic.Com Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com</link>
	<description>Your #1 Source for Classic Country Music News and Information!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;The Voice&#8217; Is Being Boxed Up by Briguy</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/08/commentary/the-voice-is-being-boxed-up/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Briguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=287#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>I sure hope they include the original versions of his late 1970s and early 1980s hits instead of his later re-records. Not that they were bad, but I've said this before on this site ... be "original" (pardon the pun); I and I'm sure many others want to hear the songs as they first heard it 30 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope they include the original versions of his late 1970s and early 1980s hits instead of his later re-records. Not that they were bad, but I&#8217;ve said this before on this site &#8230; be &#8220;original&#8221; (pardon the pun); I and I&#8217;m sure many others want to hear the songs as they first heard it 30 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Entertainer Jerry Reed - East Bound and Down for the Count at 71 by Briguy</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/09/commentary/entertainer-jerry-reed-east-bound-and-down-for-the-count-at-71/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>Briguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=290#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>I posted an entry about Jerry Reed's death over on the forums side of the site.

As kids, my brother and I loved "The Bird," simply for what it was ... a funny, tongue-in-cheek story of a naive man who was scammed by a con artist who sold him a "musical bird." I also seem to remember his roles in the "Smokey and the Bandit" movies; never saw "Waterboy," though, but I do remember a guest role he had on the sitcom "Alice."

Another sad day in country music with the passing of this talented guitarist, songwriter and singer ... and all-around musician.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted an entry about Jerry Reed&#8217;s death over on the forums side of the site.</p>
<p>As kids, my brother and I loved &#8220;The Bird,&#8221; simply for what it was &#8230; a funny, tongue-in-cheek story of a naive man who was scammed by a con artist who sold him a &#8220;musical bird.&#8221; I also seem to remember his roles in the &#8220;Smokey and the Bandit&#8221; movies; never saw &#8220;Waterboy,&#8221; though, but I do remember a guest role he had on the sitcom &#8220;Alice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another sad day in country music with the passing of this talented guitarist, songwriter and singer &#8230; and all-around musician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Differing Styles by Briguy</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/08/commentary/differing-styles/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>Briguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=277#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>Todd — While I agree that Vince Gill is a little too smooth vocally (less so for Rodney Crowell), it's heart and respect for a country legend that matter here. It'd be no different than if you were to listen to Tony Bennett or Perry Como covers of Hank Sr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd — While I agree that Vince Gill is a little too smooth vocally (less so for Rodney Crowell), it&#8217;s heart and respect for a country legend that matter here. It&#8217;d be no different than if you were to listen to Tony Bennett or Perry Como covers of Hank Sr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All I Wanna Do Is To Poke Holes In My Ear Drums by Briguy</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/08/commentary/all-i-wanna-do-is-to-poke-holes-in-my-ear-drums/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Briguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=247#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>Sure, "All I Want to Do" is lyrically soft and yes, it is consistent with some of the tripe that comes out of Nashville these days. But Sugarland justifiably had a hit with their fans ... because the song is fun to sing along with. Just a simple, fun-to-sing-along-with song. No real harm, no foul. There's certainly worse songs out there (for instance, Jessica Simpson's "Come On Over," although again it appeals because of its singability rather than originality). And don't even get me started about Roseanne singing(?) our national anthem, except to say whomever chose her made a very poor choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, &#8220;All I Want to Do&#8221; is lyrically soft and yes, it is consistent with some of the tripe that comes out of Nashville these days. But Sugarland justifiably had a hit with their fans &#8230; because the song is fun to sing along with. Just a simple, fun-to-sing-along-with song. No real harm, no foul. There&#8217;s certainly worse songs out there (for instance, Jessica Simpson&#8217;s &#8220;Come On Over,&#8221; although again it appeals because of its singability rather than originality). And don&#8217;t even get me started about Roseanne singing(?) our national anthem, except to say whomever chose her made a very poor choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buddy Harman: The Heartbeat of Country Music by Lost &#38; Sound</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/08/commentary/buddy-harman-the-heartbeat-of-country-music/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost &#38; Sound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=268#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Drummer Buddy Harman: Shaping The ‘Nashville&#160;Sound’...&lt;/strong&gt;


Roy Orbison’s “Pretty Woman” has a simple, but great opening: a pounding snare on every downbeat, and the hi-hat on the eights. It takes a genius to keep it simple and make it sound distinctively at the same time.
The genius in this case is Budd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Drummer Buddy Harman: Shaping The ‘Nashville&nbsp;Sound’&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Roy Orbison’s “Pretty Woman” has a simple, but great opening: a pounding snare on every downbeat, and the hi-hat on the eights. It takes a genius to keep it simple and make it sound distinctively at the same time.<br />
The genius in this case is Budd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack Doesn&#8217;t Speak Jive by ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/08/commentary/barack-doesnt-speak-jive/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=250#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Awesome entry, Todd... Sho 'nuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome entry, Todd&#8230; Sho &#8217;nuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stickin&#8217; It To The Oilman by gtrman</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/07/commentary/stickin-it-to-the-oilman/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>gtrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=209#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>Just a little update on Hey Mr. Oilman.
The song is now the title track to Ronnie McDowells new album. The long awaited album "Hey Mr. Oilman" will be released by CURB records very soon. The single has already been sent to radio. I will personally be glad to hear this anthemic song on the radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little update on Hey Mr. Oilman.<br />
The song is now the title track to Ronnie McDowells new album. The long awaited album &#8220;Hey Mr. Oilman&#8221; will be released by CURB records very soon. The single has already been sent to radio. I will personally be glad to hear this anthemic song on the radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crime of Passion by Briguy</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/06/commentary/crime-of-passion/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>Briguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=198#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>I agree ... it's time for Mr. Tanner to prove his claim with solid, hard evidence or forever hold his peace.

Um, you get these claims sometimes, where a famous person dies and then weeks later, an individual comes forward claiming he/she was their biological parent. Some were legitimate claims; others were proven to be little more than fortune seekers.

I don't have any facts to back up how often stories such as this occur, except I'd venture to say it happens more often than you think. I guess it will be up to the courts to decide which category Mr. Tanner fits — "legit" or "fortune seeker."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8230; it&#8217;s time for Mr. Tanner to prove his claim with solid, hard evidence or forever hold his peace.</p>
<p>Um, you get these claims sometimes, where a famous person dies and then weeks later, an individual comes forward claiming he/she was their biological parent. Some were legitimate claims; others were proven to be little more than fortune seekers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any facts to back up how often stories such as this occur, except I&#8217;d venture to say it happens more often than you think. I guess it will be up to the courts to decide which category Mr. Tanner fits — &#8220;legit&#8221; or &#8220;fortune seeker.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Happened to Hard Work by Briguy</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/06/commentary/what-happened-to-hard-work/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>Briguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=191#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>I tend to avoid these talent shows for a reason different from the talent level of the contestants. I think that sometimes, these shows focus too much on the negative comments from the judges (and they're not necessarily critiques, either, but mean-spirited remarks about the contestants' talent or lack thereof). Sure, you have outstanding talent like Carrie Underwood who win shows such as "American Idol" and go on to even greater heights, but "American Idol" and Underwood have been a few of the exceptions. (Remember, Sawyer Brown and Patsy Cline were also talent show award winners).  The problem with Buddy Jewell, as pleasant as he was, was that when placed alongside other singers, he was not that distinctive; I haven't heard Erika Jo's music, but I'd imagine things were the same for her. 

To me, it wouldn't make a difference who was doing the critiquing, be it Merle or George or — and I know Todd you'll cringe, but — Kellie Pickler. A great singer is a great singer, no matter who does the judging on these talent shows, and a non-distinctive singer will have a hit or two and then fade from the limelight. It's not a knock against them at all; after all, I do think Buddy Jewell and Erika Jo worked hard, but in the end each of them didn't have what was needed to make them lasting successes.

My recommendation is to avoid most of these talent shows. Too much focus on the backstage activities, mean-spirited and inane comments that have little to nothing to do with the performer or his/her talents and merits, and way too much focus on particiularly bad performers rather than the "outstanding" ones. At least "Star Search" didn't air clips of bad singers' auditions (although there were probably quite a few bad performances for varied reasons that did make it to air).

As for picking John Cena and Larry the Cable Guy — entertaining, but not music critics — to judge, my only guess is that they give real-world, listener insight into whether fans may like a singer. Which is fine, except that these are just "one man's opinion."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to avoid these talent shows for a reason different from the talent level of the contestants. I think that sometimes, these shows focus too much on the negative comments from the judges (and they&#8217;re not necessarily critiques, either, but mean-spirited remarks about the contestants&#8217; talent or lack thereof). Sure, you have outstanding talent like Carrie Underwood who win shows such as &#8220;American Idol&#8221; and go on to even greater heights, but &#8220;American Idol&#8221; and Underwood have been a few of the exceptions. (Remember, Sawyer Brown and Patsy Cline were also talent show award winners).  The problem with Buddy Jewell, as pleasant as he was, was that when placed alongside other singers, he was not that distinctive; I haven&#8217;t heard Erika Jo&#8217;s music, but I&#8217;d imagine things were the same for her. </p>
<p>To me, it wouldn&#8217;t make a difference who was doing the critiquing, be it Merle or George or — and I know Todd you&#8217;ll cringe, but — Kellie Pickler. A great singer is a great singer, no matter who does the judging on these talent shows, and a non-distinctive singer will have a hit or two and then fade from the limelight. It&#8217;s not a knock against them at all; after all, I do think Buddy Jewell and Erika Jo worked hard, but in the end each of them didn&#8217;t have what was needed to make them lasting successes.</p>
<p>My recommendation is to avoid most of these talent shows. Too much focus on the backstage activities, mean-spirited and inane comments that have little to nothing to do with the performer or his/her talents and merits, and way too much focus on particiularly bad performers rather than the &#8220;outstanding&#8221; ones. At least &#8220;Star Search&#8221; didn&#8217;t air clips of bad singers&#8217; auditions (although there were probably quite a few bad performances for varied reasons that did make it to air).</p>
<p>As for picking John Cena and Larry the Cable Guy — entertaining, but not music critics — to judge, my only guess is that they give real-world, listener insight into whether fans may like a singer. Which is fine, except that these are just &#8220;one man&#8217;s opinion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kenny Chesney Gets Above His Raisin&#8217; by charleyprideroolz</title>
		<link>http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/2008/05/commentary/kenny-chesney-gets-above-his-raisin/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>charleyprideroolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purecountrymusic.com/?p=178#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>Sir - Many of us agree that Kenny Chesney is guilty of repeated acts of douchebaggery. As Rene Zellweger can tell you, his tractor is NOT sexy unless you have a Kix Brooks mustache and read "Out and About" (not that there's anything wrong with that, I'm just saying). You're right about one thing - if there is one award that should be determined partly by fans' votes it is Entertainer of the Year. But it sounds like you'd rather put ALL the power in the hands of the fans, and as Rascal Flatts proved with their free MP3 download promotion (cheap bastards), the fans can be bribed easily. Industry votes are essential to this award, because it is more than a popularity contest: the ACM's criteria for the award include "artistic merit, appearances on television, appearances in films, songwriting, writing and contributions to the country music industry." At the expense of sounding like an arrogant industry jackass myself, the public can't be relied upon to objectively judge artistic merit. Otherwise, how could Kenny Chesney or Rascal Flatts have gained such exposure in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir - Many of us agree that Kenny Chesney is guilty of repeated acts of douchebaggery. As Rene Zellweger can tell you, his tractor is NOT sexy unless you have a Kix Brooks mustache and read &#8220;Out and About&#8221; (not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that, I&#8217;m just saying). You&#8217;re right about one thing - if there is one award that should be determined partly by fans&#8217; votes it is Entertainer of the Year. But it sounds like you&#8217;d rather put ALL the power in the hands of the fans, and as Rascal Flatts proved with their free MP3 download promotion (cheap bastards), the fans can be bribed easily. Industry votes are essential to this award, because it is more than a popularity contest: the ACM&#8217;s criteria for the award include &#8220;artistic merit, appearances on television, appearances in films, songwriting, writing and contributions to the country music industry.&#8221; At the expense of sounding like an arrogant industry jackass myself, the public can&#8217;t be relied upon to objectively judge artistic merit. Otherwise, how could Kenny Chesney or Rascal Flatts have gained such exposure in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
